Laws Governing Corporate Responsibility
Boatright argues that the best way of achieving the deterrent
effect for which laws governing corporate responsibility are
intended, is by placing the weight of responsibility for misconduct
on the corporation (and derivatively on the shareholders) as
opposed to individuals who actually conduct the misconduct.
Do you agree with his assessment on pragmatic grounds? On
moral grounds? Why?
Laws Governing Corporate Responsibility
Boatright argues that the best way of achieving the deterrent
effect for which laws governing corporate responsibility are
intended, is by placing the weight of responsibility for misconduct
on the corporation (and derivatively on the shareholders) as
opposed to individuals who actually conduct the misconduct.
Do you agree with his assessment on pragmatic grounds? On
moral grounds? Why?
Laws Governing Corporate Responsibility
Boatright argues that the best way of achieving the deterrent
effect for which laws governing corporate responsibility are
intended, is by placing the weight of responsibility for misconduct
on the corporation (and derivatively on the shareholders) as
opposed to individuals who actually conduct the misconduct.
Do you agree with his assessment on pragmatic grounds? On
moral grounds? Why?
Laws Governing Corporate Responsibility
Boatright argues that the best way of achieving the deterrent
effect for which laws governing corporate responsibility are
intended, is by placing the weight of responsibility for misconduct
on the corporation (and derivatively on the shareholders) as
opposed to individuals who actually conduct the misconduct.
Do you agree with his assessment on pragmatic grounds? On
moral grounds? Why?
